Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015
The Supreme Court in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra and another ((2014) 9 SCC 129) held that “the territorial jurisdiction is restricted to the Court within whose local jurisdiction the offence was committed, which in the present context is where the cheque is dishonoured by the bank on which it is drawn” as against the then prevalent practice of filing complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (“Act”) before the court in whose jurisdiction the cheque was presented for payment.